I constantly thought the main difference between versions "a" and also "b" the MATLAB to be "b" gift 6 month "better" than version "a" and, of course, this means that normally the version "b" is walking to be a more up-to-date version, with more features also - gift the main intent to have new releases every semester. However, just the various other day a friend of mine declared something ns wasn"t able come double-check elsewhere:
"Usually the "a" execution are more stable (...) being "b" more of a pre-release of variation "a" that the following year , having functions that have actually past beta however still have the right to be improved" (and supposedly will be improved and perfected in ~ "a"). Yet isn"t this the story with just any release? Don"t you always implement new things and also improve things of the past as necessary?
" "b" will commonly have much more features 보다 "a", but the variation "b" is going to be something around 90% to 100% reliable, when "a" will constantly be 100% reliable". Have someone ever before come across these reliability comes to once?
Is someone capable of confirming this? ns have always seen it together if the real beta release/period bring away place just months prior to the actual release of "a" and "b", when invernessgangshow.net release its yes, really beta version to gain feedback. To be I absent something?
*

https://www.invernessgangshow.net/matlabcentral/answers/454956-what-s-the-actual-difference-between-versions-a-and-b-of-matlab-other-than-being-6-months-apart#comment_690994


Someone indigenous invernessgangshow.net will have actually to carry out the definitive response. In the interim, see if perusing the relax Notes (link) for numerous releases reveals a pattern.

https://www.invernessgangshow.net/matlabcentral/answers/454956-what-s-the-actual-difference-between-versions-a-and-b-of-matlab-other-than-being-6-months-apart#comment_691015


I think your friend is just comprising stuff...there"s no evidence to that effect at all; and also certainly "a" releases have bugs simply as do "b" releases.
My monitoring is that TMW releases functions into the wild through whichever update is next based upon some internal and also nondisclosed decision-making process as to even if it is the details feature is/is not "ready because that prime time".
Some pretty major features have actually been presented piecemeal (thinking that datetime as certain example) v it taking several releases for numerous of the corollary functions to end up being "datetime aware" and some that the specialty graphs quiet weren"t together of R2018b while the base class came out clear earlier in R2014b.

You are watching: Difference between matlab a and b


Personally, I"d prefer TMW not worry around the 6-month cycle yet release functions when lock really space "ripe" fairly than somewhat piecemeal, but they"ve gained the competitive pressure to transaction with.
*


https://www.invernessgangshow.net/matlabcentral/answers/454956-what-s-the-actual-difference-between-versions-a-and-b-of-matlab-other-than-being-6-months-apart#comment_1628823


Adding simply a small -- what is acutally different is constantly just a mix of features and an insect fixes (and, occasionally, a new pest :) ); it"s favor Christmas double a year; you never understand what"s going to be under the tree!
Since TMW never ever talks publicly around features under advance nor once such might be released, it"s constantly somewhat of a surprise -- one deserve to go look at prior release notes to get an idea of just just how eclectic things can be.

See more: Factor X^3 - 8 ) ? How Do You Factor X^3


The one downside is that sometimes things get removed (not lot that I actively still used, fortunately), but occasionally some of the syntax/behavior alters are problematical in just how code features so if one has production code, one needs to be careful.
*